up on the watershed

Tuesday, January 08, 2008

I think it's no secret among progessive voters that this year's Democratic primary is both painful and an utter celebration of progress. It is not so simple to break down the candidates in terms of their genders and races and yet, I know I cannot be alone in wishing for the first black president of the United States AND the first female president. I've said it before--how's a girl to choose?

But it seems as though not everyone remembers the testosterone laden legacy of the Oval Office. To wit, this article from the AP says:

Clinton, the former first lady who finished third in Iowa, was mounting an unexpectedly stiff challenge to Obama in the nation's first primary. ... She had 39 percent of the vote in the Democratic primary to 34 percent for Obama, who is seeking to become the nation's first black president.

I'm flummoxed. Though I certainly think her exposure during her husband's tenure as president has influenced the electorate and likely her own political aspirations and it is thus worth mentioning that she is a former first lady, does it not deserve mention that Hillary Rodham Clinton is seeking to become the nation's first female president?

2 Comments:

  • At Wednesday, January 09, 2008 11:34:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Don't be ridiculous. That's not important. Everyone knows ladies cannot be Presidents. Now get back in the kitchen, kick off those shoes and start making some babies!

     
  • At Thursday, January 10, 2008 9:08:00 AM, Blogger Unknown said…

    The only time her gender comes up is when she shows emotion and then the other male candidates make sure to talk about how the president will face tougher things than the campaign trail and must be tough.
    What about the Iron Lady of Britain, good ole Madge? Or Madeline Albright? I mean, surely women can't be tough? Oh, no...

     

Post a Comment

<< Home